Updated Jul-2024 NIST-COBIT-2019 Free Exam Files Downloaded Instantly
Practice Exams and Training Solutions for Certifications
NEW QUESTION # 18
The activity of determining an appropriate target capability level for each process occurs within which implementation phase?
- A. Phase 4 - What Needs to Be Done?
- B. Phase 3 - Where Do We Want to Be?
- C. Phase 2 - Where Are We Now?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The activity of determining an appropriate target capability level for each process occurs within Implementation Phase 3, as it helps to set an improvement target and identify gaps and potential solutions using COBIT's guidance. This involves creating a detailed business case and a high-level program plan for the implementation12.
ReferencesDefining Target Capability Levels in COBIT 2019: A Proposal for RefinementCOBIT 2019 Design and Implementation COBIT Implementation, page 31.
NEW QUESTION # 19
In which CSF step should an enterprise document its existing category and subcategory outcome achievements?
- A. Step 3: Create a Current Profile
- B. Step 4: Conduct a Risk Assessment
- C. Step 1: Prioritize and Scope
Answer: A
Explanation:
This CSF step involves documenting the existing category and subcategory outcome achievements, by using the implementation status to indicate the degree to which the cybersecurity outcomes defined by the CSF Subcategories are currently being achieved by the organization12. The Current Profile reflects the current cybersecurity posture of the organization, and helps to identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement3 .
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework v1.1 - CSF Tools - Identity Digital 3: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA : REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING THE NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USING COBIT 2019.
NEW QUESTION # 20
Which of the following is an objective of Implementation Phase 3 - Where Do We Want to Be?
- A. Integrate the improvement projects into the overall program plan.
- B. Monitor, measure, and report on project progress.
- C. Create a detailed business case and high-level program plan from gathered information.
Answer: C
Explanation:
This is an objective of Implementation Phase 3: Where Do We Want to Be?, because it involves defining the desired state of the enterprise's governance and management system, based on the stakeholder needs, drivers, and scope12. This objective also includes developing a business case that provides the rationale and justification for the improvement program, and a high-level program plan that outlines the scope, objectives, approach, and resources of the program3 .
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation - ISACA 3: Business Case Development - ISACA : How to Write a Business Case for Cybersecurity Projects | Infosec
NEW QUESTION # 21
Which of the following is a PRIMARY input into Steps 2 and 3: Orient and Create a Current Profile?
- A. Updating business cases
- B. Defining business cases
- C. Evaluating business cases
Answer: B
Explanation:
Defining business cases is a primary input into Steps 2 and 3: Orient and Create a Current Profile, because it involves identifying the business drivers, mission, objectives, and risk appetite of the organization, as well as the scope and boundaries of the cybersecurity program12. A business case is a document that provides the rationale and justification for initiating a cybersecurity project or program, and describes the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives34.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 3: Business Case Development - ISACA 4: How to Write a Business Case for Cybersecurity Projects | Infosec
NEW QUESTION # 22
When aligning to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, what should occur after tier levels and framework core outcomes are determined?
- A. Report discovered issues to senior management.
- B. Compare current and target profiles.
- C. Assign mitigating control development.
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, after determining the tier levels and framework core outcomes, the next step is to compare the current and target profiles, which describe the organization's current and desired cybersecurity posture based on the framework core functions, categories, and subcategories1. This comparison helps to identify the gaps and prioritize the actions for improvement2.
ReferencesCybersecurity Framework Components | NISTWhat is the NIST Cybersecurity Framework? | IBM
NEW QUESTION # 23
The CSF Implementation Tiers distinguish three fundamental dimensions of risk management to help enterprises evaluate which of the following?
- A. Cybersecurity landscape
- B. Cybersecurity posture
- C. Cybersecurity threats
Answer: B
Explanation:
The CSF Implementation Tiers distinguish three fundamental dimensions of risk management to help enterprises evaluate their cybersecurity posture, which is the alignment of their cybersecurity activities and outcomes with their business objectives and risk appetite12. The Tiers range from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier 4) and describe the degree of rigor, integration, and collaboration of the organization's cybersecurity risk management practices12.
References: 1: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework FAQs Framework Components | NIST
NEW QUESTION # 24
Combining CSF principles with COBIT 2019 practices helps to ensure value, manage risk, and support mission drivers through support and direction of:
- A. the board of directors and executive management.
- B. the chief information officer and IT management.
- C. the chief information security manager and the data protection officer.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Combining CSF principles with COBIT 2019 practices helps to ensure value, manage risk, and support mission drivers through support and direction of the board of directors and executive management, as they are responsible for setting the vision, strategy, and objectives of the organization, and for overseeing the governance and management of IT-related operations12.
ReferencesConnecting COBIT 2019 to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework - ISACACOBIT 2019 (With Principles, Components, Users and Benefits)
NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following is the MOST beneficial result of an effective CSF implementation plan?
- A. Key stakeholders understand the quick wins of the cybersecurity program.
- B. Cybersecurity risk management practices are formalized and institutionalized.
- C. Key stakeholders understand the cybersecurity requirements of the chosen vendors.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The most beneficial result of an effective CSF implementation plan is that cybersecurity risk management practices are formalized and institutionalized, which means that the organization has established and maintained a consistent and comprehensive approach to managing cybersecurity risks across its systems, processes, and people. This result can help the organization to reduce the likelihood and impact of cybersecurity events, improve its resilience and compliance, and enhance its reputation and trust12.
ReferencesPublic Draft: The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2, page 1.Cybersecurity Framework | NIST
NEW QUESTION # 26
The seven high-level CSF steps generally align to which of the following in COBIT 2019?
- A. High-level categories
- B. High-level functions
- C. High-level phases
Answer: C
Explanation:
The seven high-level CSF steps generally align to the high-level phases of the COBIT 2019 implementation guide, which are: What are the drivers?; Where are we now?; Where do we want to be?; What needs to be done?; How do we get there?; Did we get there?; and How do we keep the momentum going?12. These phases provide a structured approach for implementing a governance system using COBIT 2019, and can be mapped to the CSF steps of Prioritize and Scope, Orient, Create a Current Profile, Conduct a Risk Assessment, Create a Target Profile, Determine, Analyze and Prioritize Gaps, and Implement Action Plan34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation - ISACA 3: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 4: REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING THE NIST CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USING COBIT 2019.
NEW QUESTION # 27
Which role will benefit MOST from a better understanding of the current cybersecurity posture by applying the CSF?
- A. Legal experts
- B. Executives
- C. Acquisition specialists
Answer: B
Explanation:
Executives are the role that will benefit most from a better understanding of the current cybersecurity posture by applying the CSF. This is because executives are responsible for setting the strategic direction, objectives, and priorities for the organization, as well as overseeing the allocation of resources and the management of risks1. By applying the CSF, executives can gain a comprehensive and consistent view of the cybersecurity risks and capabilities of the organization, and align them with the business goals and requirements2. The CSF can also help executives communicate and collaborate with other stakeholders, such as regulators, customers, suppliers, and partners, on cybersecurity issues3.
References: 1: Implementing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework Using COBIT 2019 | ISACA 2:
Cybersecurity Framework | NIST 3: Framework Documents | NIST
NEW QUESTION # 28
Analysis is one of the categories within which of the following Core Functions?
- A. Detect
- B. Respond
- C. Recover
Answer: A
Explanation:
Analysis is one of the six categories within the Detect function of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. The Analysis category aims to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event by performing data aggregation, correlation, and analysis12.
References: 1: The Five Functions | NIST 2: Cybersecurity Framework Components | NIST
NEW QUESTION # 29
The goals cascade supports prioritization of management objectives based on:
- A. the prioritization of stakeholder needs.
- B. the prioritization of enterprise goals.
- C. the prioritization of business objectives.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The goals cascade is a mechanism that translates the stakeholder needs into specific, actionable, and customized goals at different levels of the enterprise12. The stakeholder needs are the drivers of the governance system and reflect the expectations and requirements of the internal and external parties that have an interest or influence on the enterprise34. The goals cascade supports the prioritization of management objectives based on the stakeholder needs, as well as the alignment of the enterprise goals, the alignment goals, and the governance and management objectives12.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Goals Cascade: A Blueprint for Success 2: COBIT 2019 Framework - ITSM Docs - ITSM Documents & Templates 3: COBIT | Control Objectives for Information Technologies | ISACA
4: Aligning IT goals using the COBIT5 Goals Cascade
NEW QUESTION # 30
Which of the following is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers?
- A. Current capability rating for selected processes
- B. Risk response document
- C. Program wake-up call
Answer: C
Explanation:
A program wake-up call is an input to COBIT Implementation Phase 1: What Are the Drivers, because it is a trigger event that creates a sense of urgency and a need for change in the organization's governance and management of enterprise I&T12. A program wake-up call can be internal or external, positive or negative, such as a major incident, a new regulation, a strategic initiative, or a stakeholder feedback34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation - ISACA 3: Tips for Implementing COBIT in a Continuously Changing Environment - ISACA 4: 7 Phases of COBIT Implementation: Explained - The Knowledge Academy
NEW QUESTION # 31
Which of the following is a KEY activity of COBIT Implementation Phase 2: Where Are We Now?
- A. Identification of challenges and success factors
- B. Identification of applicable compliance requirements
- C. Identification and definition of improvement targets
Answer: B
Explanation:
This is a key activity of COBIT Implementation Phase 2: Where Are We Now?, because it involves assessing the current state of the enterprise's governance and management system, as well as its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats12. This activity also includes identifying the relevant stakeholders, drivers, and scope of the implementation program. Therefore, this activity requires a thorough understanding of the external laws, regulations, and contractual obligations that apply to the enterprise and its I&T activities34.
References: 1: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation - ISACA 3: Compliance with External Requirements - Morland-Austin 4: COBIT 5 : Key Concepts and Principles of COBIT 5 Explained
NEW QUESTION # 32
Which function of the CSF is addressed by incorporating governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) elements into the implementation plan?
- A. Detect
- B. Identify
- C. Protect
Answer: B
Explanation:
The function of the CSF that is addressed by incorporating governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) elements into the implementation plan is Identify, which assists in developing an organizational understanding to managing cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities. GRC elements help to define the governance program, the legal and regulatory requirements, the risk management strategy, and the supply chain risk management strategy of the organization12.
ReferencesThe Five Functions | NISTNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Understanding the "Govern" Function
NEW QUESTION # 33
......
Q&As with Explanations Verified & Correct Answers: https://www.prep4sureguide.com/NIST-COBIT-2019-prep4sure-exam-guide.html
Dumps Free Test Engine Player Verified Answers: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vYV1qQA5o2c2Ktkwmyd8oipB60ckhMwM